BP’s Sun King Lord Browne reveals his darker side

•February 8, 2010 • Leave a Comment
Former oil chief admits to obsession and loneliness during his 12-year reign at BP
Former BP chief executive Lord BrowneLord Browne has published his memoirs, charting his 41-year career with BP. Photograph: Bruno Vincent/EPA

Lord Browne has admitted he stayed at BP too long because he had become obsessed with running the oil group. He has also suggested in his revealing memoirs published this week that his arrogance and a culture of complacency contributed to BP’s failure to prevent a huge oil spill in Alaska.

Lord Browne quit suddenly as chief executive of the company in May 2007 after a newspaper revealed he had lied about how he had met his boyfriend, Jeff Chevalier. The board, then led by chairman Peter Sutherland, had already forced him to announce that he would retire by the end of 2008 after a series of operational disasters on Browne’s watch, including an explosion at the company’s Texas City oil refinery, resulting in 15 deaths and 170 injuries, as well as a large oil spill in Alaska.

Browne’s book, Beyond Business – a reference to his rebranding of BP as “Beyond Petroleum” – charts his 41-year career with the oil group, 12 of them as chief executive. He lays bare his unhappiness and admits he made mistakes. But the book also reads like an attempt to vindicate himself and restore his reputation after it had been so roundly trashed in the wake of his shock departure.

He said it had been an “error of judgment” to do an interview with the Financial Times in 2002, which was gushing in its praise of Browne, who had rejuvenated BP and turned it into one of the largest oil companies in the world. The fateful article dubbed him the Sun King and the sobriquet stuck. He said the article had “set me up as an arrogant target”, adding that “all that went wrong with the company would ever after be personalised”.

But the book – trailed on the cover as “an inspirational memoir from a visionary leader” – reveals plenty of evidence that Browne himself was responsible for much of the aura which surrounded him. As he battled to keep his relationship with his boyfriend out of the newspapers in early 2007, he took solace from the external calm exhibited by then prime minister, Tony Blair, who was facing a public backlash against his support of the Iraq war at the time.

Browne recounts many fascinating meetings with world leaders, including Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Libya’s Colonel Gaddafi. Possibly, he began to see himself more as an international statesman than a chief executive of a company.

Browne admits his loneliness drove his obsession with BP, which he described as his “family”. He wrote: “I became increasingly aware of the all-consuming action of being at the helm of BP and the emptiness of my private life.” He also reveals he believes he should have left the company sooner. “I did not know how to leave … First, there always seemed to be something I wanted to follow through … That is what a lot of people in similar positions think, but it is a bad reason for staying.”

He also hints at the mounting internal disquiet at BP over his refusal to step down. When the then 58-year-old gave a speech in 2006 arguing that executives should not be forced to retire because of age, he writes in a typical piece of Browne disingenuousness that some BP insiders believed he was trying to extend his tenure. “I thought that demonstrated a touching, if somewhat undue, sensitivity to everything I said,” he writes, before admitting in the next sentence that he wanted BP to scrap its mandatory retirement age of 60 for executive directors.

It is telling that there is no mention in his book’s 254 pages of former chairman Sutherland. Browne only blandly records: “25 July 2006: BP announced that I would retire in December 2008.”

Tantalisingly, he reveals that he and his then opposite number at Shell, Jeroen van der Veer, discussed a possible merger during a stroll beside Lake Como in Italy in 2004. But in spite of allocating a group of employees to look at the plan in detail, a handful of his own board members blocked the move and it went no further.

In the chapter aptly titled “US disasters”, Browne writes that when he received his first call about the explosion at the Texas refinery: “My blood ran cold.” He admits BP had relied too much on “personal safety” – telling staff how to be safe at work – and not enough on “process safety” – making sure equipment was safe. But he glossed over the findings of the Baker panel, appointed by the company to investigate the causes of the disaster, which was damning in its criticism of BP’s operation of the refinery. Browne blamed a failure to fully integrate the refinery with the rest of BP and said that the panel had found similar deficiencies at other companies’ refineries. But he acknowledged: “However, the tragedy happened at BP.”

He does admit he should have done more to prevent an estimated 267,000 gallons of oil leaking from one of its pipelines in Alaska. He writes that he had put too much faith in its leakage monitoring systems and that other executives should have stood up to him more. “I wish someone had challenged me and been brave enough to say: ‘We need to ask more disagreeable questions.’” Possibly his closest lieutenants who were vying to succeed him – the “turtles”, so-called after the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles because they would immediately appear on the scene whenever needed – also allowed themselves to be blinded by the Sun King.

Browne’s strongest self-criticism for any of BP’s operational problems and accidents follows, but typically it is inferred and not explicit. “As a leader it is hard to find that delicate balance between confidence, humility and arrogance. You need confidence to make decisions to keep moving the business forward … yet arrogance may cause you to make a decision before considering the range of possibilities.”

Browne’s fall from grace

Lord Browne of Madingley’s resignation in May 2007 was a humiliating way to end his 12 years as head of BP.He was forced to step down 18 months sooner than he had originally planned, after he admitted lying in court over his relationship with Jeff Chevalier, a former boyfriend. For one of Britain’s captains of industry, who was on first-name terms with Tony Blair and other world leaders, it was an almighty comedown.

The 61 year-old had kept his sexuality secret throughout his career in an industry which is notoriously macho. Only a few close friends knew about his four-year relationship with Chevalier, a young Canadian he met on a gay escort agency website. When the relationship broke down and Browne refused to keep financially supporting him, Chevalier sold his story to a Sunday newspaper in early 2007. Browne attempted to get an injunction to prevent publication and lied to BP’s lawyers, and later in court, when he told them he had met Chevalier while jogging in Battersea Park. He wrote: “I was ashamed and embarrassed, and had yet to confront the secret I had hidden in a dark corner all my life … I just could not bring myself to tell the truth.”

Browne is now a managing director of Riverstone Holdings, a private equity firm which invests in energy companies.

Worldview: Iran should free the hikers

•February 4, 2010 • Leave a Comment

SAVE THIS | EMAIL THIS | Close

Posted on Thu, Feb. 4, 2010

The regime gains nothing by keeping three Americans imprisoned.

By Trudy Rubin

Inquirer Opinion Columnist

More U.S. and international attention should be focused on the plight of three American hikers who have been languishing in solitary confinement in Tehran’s notorious Evin prison for six months. They have had no access to a lawyer or any communication with their families, who have no idea of their condition or mental state.
This is a case that could – and still should – be resolved on a humanitarian basis. But it has become caught in the web of Iran’s domestic politics and troubles with the outside world.

On Tuesday, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suggested that the Americans be exchanged for 11 Iranians supposedly held in the United States. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ruled out such a swap and called for the release of the hikers. There is no parallel between them and Ahmadinejad’s list, which includes defectors and men convicted of illegal arms deals.

The three Americans, all University of California at Berkeley graduates, went astray while trekking in the mountains of Iraqi Kurdistan, where they apparently crossed an unmarked border into Iran. The Tehran prosecutor said Iran might charge them with espionage, but no charges have been brought.

You may wonder why Americans were vacationing in Iraqi Kurdistan. I can tell you, having been there: Those mountains are extraordinarily beautiful, and Kurds hike there on vacations. Moreover, Iraqi Kurdistan, unlike the rest of Iraq, is so peaceful one can forget that it’s surrounded by bad neighborhoods.

Sarah Shourd, 31, and Shane Bauer, 27, were living in Damascus, Syria, where she taught English and studied Arabic and he was a freelance journalist.

Josh Fattal, 27, who grew up in Elkins Park, had been living on an Oregon farm and teaching about sustainable development. He had just finished a stint as a teacher in a global travel program for college students, and was visiting with his friends on the way home.

If you visit the Web site set up by the hikers’ families, www.freethehikers.org, you can see the three are youthful idealists and outdoorsmen. They may be guilty of carelessness in not checking their route with locals, but spies they are not.

Presumably, that has become obvious to the Iranians. Yet Swiss diplomats, who represent U.S. interests in Iran – with which we don’t have diplomatic relations – have been permitted only two visits with the hikers, the last in October. The hikers’ Iranian lawyer can’t get access to them or any information about the case; their mothers have applied for Iranian visas to visit them, but have received no reply.

It’s hard to imagine the effects of six months of isolation. Belgian tourist Idesbald van den Bosch, who was held for three months in Evin and saw one of the hikers, says: “I’m worried for their well-being because I know the effect solitary confinement had on me.”

So why are Fattal, Shourd, and Bauer being held indefinitely and incommunicado, which violates Iranian law?

The hikers have become pawns in Iran’s dispute with the United States and the United Nations over its nuclear program. Yet it’s hard to see how Tehran can profit from holding three civilians, whose case stokes international concern about Iranian violations of human rights.

Eighty leading academics, intellectuals, artists, writers, filmmakers, and journalists have signed a petition asking that the hikers be set free. They range from British billionaire businessman Richard Branson to Palestinian activist Hanan Ashrawi.

Tehran should take note that the list also includes MIT professor Noam Chomsky, a harsh critic of U.S. foreign policy, who says the detention hurts those who call for a shift in America’s approach to Iran. It also includes Terry Anderson, a journalist who was held hostage for seven years in Lebanon by Shiites linked to Iran. Does Iran want to remind the world of that outrage?

The world’s eyes are already on Iran in the run-up to the Feb. 11 anniversary of the 1979 revolution. Tehran’s regime faces more demonstrations by a (mostly) peaceful opposition protesting its government’s violation of its own laws and constitution. International human-rights groups have condemned mass arrests and torture of Iranian dissenters, along with the hanging of two protesters.

Holding the hikers any longer will further darken Iran’s global image. Better to heed South African Nobel peace laureate Desmond Tutu, who urged Iranian authorities “not to deny [the hikers] their freedom in order to express discontent with the United States.” Why not follow Tutu’s advice and free the hikers on humanitarian grounds?

Trudy Rubin can be reached at trubin@phillynews.com.

Find this article at:

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/opinion/20100204_Worldview__Iran_should_free_the_hikers.html

Ahmadinejad suggests exchange for jailed US hikers

•February 3, 2010 • Leave a Comment

By NASSER KARIMI, Associated Press Writer

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

(02-02) 12:40 PST TEHRAN, (AP) –

Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad suggested in a television interview Tuesday that Iran would release three jailed U.S. hikers in exchange for Iranians currently serving in American prisons.

Ahmadinejad said that there were ongoing negotiations about possibly exchanging the hikers for several Iranians jailed for years in the United States.

“There are some talks under way to have an exchange, if it is possible,” he said. “Recently they (the U.S.) have sent messages, we answered to bring them (the Iranians), to bring these people (the hikers). We are hopeful that all prisoners to be released.”

Ahmadinejad did not mention any specific cases but in December Iran released a list of 11 Iranians it says are being held in the U.S. — including a nuclear scientist who disappeared in Saudi Arabia and a former Defense Ministry official who vanished in Turkey. The list also includes an Iranian arrested in Canada on charges of trying to obtain nuclear technology.

“I had said I would help in releasing them, but the attitude of some of U.S. officials damages the job,” said Ahmadinejad. “There are a large number of Iranians in prison in the U.S. They have abducted some of our citizens in other countries.”

Shane Bauer, Sarah Shourd and Josh Fattal were hiking in Iraq’s northern Kurdistan region in July when they accidentally crossed the border, their families have said.

Iran’s foreign minister said in late December that the three would be tried in court, but he did not say when a trial would begin or what the three would be charged with other than to say they had “suspicious aims.” Earlier, the country’s chief prosecutor said they were accused of spying.

Their families say that’s ludicrous and last month hired an Iranian attorney to press the case.

Ahmadinejad said there were “indications they knew they were crossing into Iran.”

The last time anyone sympathetic saw the three was at the end of October, when Swiss diplomats were granted a short visit. The U.S. has no diplomatic relationship with Iran and is represented in such matters by the Swiss. At the time, the diplomats said the three were in good health.

Their jailing comes amid continued tension between the U.S. and Iran over that nation’s nuclear program.

When the list of 11 Iranians came out State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said it appeared the Iranian government was trying to suggest some kind of equivalence between the hikers and Iranians that had left Iran.

“There really is no equivalence at all,” he said at the time.

Three of the Iranians on the list have been convicted or charged in public court proceedings in the United States. The circumstances surrounding some of the others are more mysterious.

Ali Reza Asgari, a retired general in the elite Revolutionary Guard and a former deputy defense minister, disappeared while on a private trip to Turkey in December 2006.

Shahram Amiri, an Iranian nuclear scientist, went missing while on a pilgrimage to Mecca in Saudi Arabia in June. Iran’s foreign minister has accused the U.S. of helping to kidnap him and has asked for his return.

The list also includes three Iranians who Tehran claims were abducted in Europe and sent to the U.S.: merchant Mohsen Afrasiabi, who it says disappeared in Germany, as well as electrical engineering student Majid Kakavand and a former ambassador to Jordan, Nasrollah Tajik, who it says vanished in France.

French media have reported that Kakavand was arrested in March at the request of the U.S. on suspicion he obtained electronic equipment. He was jailed, then moved to house arrest on Aug. 27. The French press has reported that Tajik went missing in Britain.

Three of the Iranians Tehran is asking about have faced public legal proceedings in the U.S.

One of them, Baktash Fattahi, is a legal U.S. resident. He was arrested in April in California and charged with conspiracy to export American-made military aircraft parts to Iran.

Another, Amir Amirnazmi, is a dual U.S.-Iranian citizen who was convicted by a court in Pennsylvania in February of business dealings with Iranian companies banned under U.S. sanctions.

Amir Hossein Ardebili was sentenced to five years in prison on Dec. 14 by a court in Wilmington, Delaware, after pleading guilty to plotting to ship U.S. military technology to Iran. Iran has called it a show trial and said Ardebili was abducted in the former Soviet republic of Georgia in 2007 before being handed over to U.S. authorities in 2008.

One of the other Iranians, Mahmoud Yadegari, was arrested in April in Canada after a joint investigation with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security and charged with trying to send nuclear technology to his native Iran.

Authorities allege Yadegari tried to procure and export pressure transducers, which can be used in the production of enriched uranium but also have many legitimate commercial uses.

The other two Iranians on the list are Amir-Shahrzad Amir-Qolikhani and Hassan Saeid Kashari. Iran gave no information about them other than to say they are being held in the U.S. without charge.

http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2010/02/02/international/i115701S24.DTL

3 Americans Now Held in Iran for Half of a Year

•February 1, 2010 • Leave a Comment

January 30, 2010

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
Filed at 6:33 p.m. ET

MINNEAPOLIS (AP) — It’s been six months since three young Americans were taken into custody in Iran, and the mother of one said even hiring an attorney in Iran has brought no new information on how they are doing.

”It’s like there’s this brick wall in front of us, and we can’t get through,” Cindy Hickey, the mother of Shane Bauer, told The Associated Press in a telephone interview. ”The concern for me as a mother is how this has to be taking a toll on them psychologically, and I would like someone to see them physically to tell me that they’re in OK health.”

Bauer, Sarah Shourd and Josh Fattal were hiking in Iraq’s northern Kurdistan region in July when they accidentally crossed the border, their families have said. All three are graduates of the University of California at Berkeley.

Iran’s foreign minister said in late December that the three would be tried in court, but he did not say when a trial would begin or what the three would be charged with other than to say they had ‘’suspicious aims.” Earlier, the country’s chief prosecutor said they were accused of spying.

Their families say that’s ludicrous and last month hired an Iranian attorney to press the case. But Hickey, who lives near Pine City, Minn., said the attorney, Masoud Shafie, has been denied visits with the three and hasn’t received any information on charges.

”He’s being told it’s not time, it’s not time,” Hickey said. ”We don’t understand this lack of movement.”

The last time anyone sympathetic saw the three was at the end of October, when Swiss diplomats were granted a short visit. The U.S. has no diplomatic relationship with Iran and is represented in such matters by the Swiss. At the time, the diplomats said the three were in good health.

Their jailing comes amid continued tension between the U.S. and Iran over that nation’s nuclear program.

It also parallels in some ways the captivity of Roxana Saberi, an Iranian-American who grew up in Fargo, N.D., and like Bauer, worked as a freelance journalist. Saberi was jailed in Iran in February 2009, tried and convicted of espionage — but then released to return to the U.S. after about four months.

”I knew this wasn’t going to be done overnight,” Hickey said. ”But I never dreamed we’d be in the same place six months later.”

The hikers have family in California, Colorado, Minnesota and Pennsylvania.

Online at:

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/01/30/us/AP-US-Iran-US-Hikers.html

New North Slope spill BP’s second in four days

•December 14, 2009 • Leave a Comment

With all this nation’s concern about the influence of foreign oil on us and the lax regulations overseas we only need to look at the North Slope’s largest producer – British Petroleum – to see how close the problem really is.

Anchorage Daily News

7,000 GALLONS: The 6-inch pipe carried produced water.


By LISA DEMER
ldemer@adn.com

(12/04/09 01:46:06)

In the midst of cleaning up a major North Slope oil spill with an unusual twist, BP has reported another spill involving a different pipeline.

Officials estimated Wednesday’s spill at more than 7,000 gallons of what’s known as produced water, the water pumped with oil from wells and then separated from crude at processing centers. BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. discovered the spill at about 1:40 p.m. Wednesday and reported it to the state Department of Environmental Conservation about an hour later.

A cause has not been determined.

The spill is the second since Sunday involving pipelines managed by BP. The Sunday oil spill still is being cleaned up as well. Officials say they have not pinpointed a cause or estimated the size of that spill.

The oil and water found leaking Sunday formed an odd, bumpy mound 5 feet tall, kind of like what might squirt out of a giant frozen-treat machine, state and federal environmental officials on the scene said Thursday in a teleconference briefing for reporters.

“One thing I will tell you, most interesting about this spill is the nature of the spill material. It is doing something that many of us seasoned responders have never seen before,” said Matt Carr, the on-scene coordinator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. “You have this large dome of semi-solid material. The best way I can describe it is like a very stiff Slurpee or a very stiff snow cone.”

Carr, who said he has responded to many spills in his 26-year career, called the mounded material a first.

Workers using shovels, bins and snowmachines finished clearing oil-misted snow on Tuesday but most of the heavily contaminated snow still must be hauled away.

The 18-inch flow line to the Lisburne Processing Center carried a mix of crude, natural gas and produced water. BP spokesman Steve Rinehart said the line had been out of operation for a few weeks because of ice plugs but that details such as exactly when the flow was shut down are part of the ongoing investigation into the leak’s cause.

Night crews on Wednesday laid down portable wooden platforms to use as a staging area. Crews also are building an ice pad about a mile and a half away where the contaminants will be melted, measured and recycled, said Randy Selman, BP incident commander. Recovered oil will be put back into production, according to BP.

A safety zone about 40 feet in diameter is centered on the leak site. So far, oil cleanup crews aren’t going into the safety zone. BP is X-raying the 18-inch pipe to look for ice plugs and pockets of gas, Selman said. Once officials have more information, they’ll be able to safely direct cleanup crews, according to the command team.

The Wednesday spill was from a 6-inch line carrying produced water inside a manifold building where different pipes come together, according to the state Department of Environmental Conservation.

BP estimated that about 5,040 gallons remained inside the building, while 2,100 spilled onto the gravel production pad, known as R Pad. The liquid was sucked into a vacuum truck but some of the water froze. It will be removed with a jackhammer or by being flushed with more water.

Copyright © // Mon Dec 14 2009 11:35:15 GMT-0800 (PST)1900 The Anchorage Daily News (www.adn.com)

Dog Helps Orca

•December 13, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Mother Jones

Photo copyright Fred Felleman It’s been a bad year for the southern resident population of orcas in Puget Sound. Seven have gone missing and are presumed dead. Including the nearly 100-year-old matriarch of K Pod, along with two reproductive-age females vital to the future of the whales. One female, L-67 showed clear signs of emaciation before she disappeared in September. That leaves only…

By Julia Whitty | Wed Nov. 19, 2008 6:00 PM PST


Tucker.jpg [1] Photo copyright Fred FellemanIt’s been a bad year for the southern resident population of orcas [2] in Puget Sound. Seven have gone missing [3] and are presumed dead. Including the nearly 100-year-old matriarch [4] of K Pod, along with two reproductive-age females vital to the future [5] of the whales. One female, L-67 showed clear signs of emaciation before she disappeared in September. That leaves only 83 animals in this culturally-unique population [6] of orca.

It’s been a bad year for salmon too—the primary prey of southern resident orca. Researchers suspect the missing whales may have starved. Now researchers at the U of Washington Center for Conservation Biology [1] are trying to answer that question using a specially trained dog. The Seattle Times reports [7] how Tucker, a black Lab, has been deployed two of the past three summers to track orca scat from the bow of a research boat.

Analysis of hormone levels in the scat suggest mortality among the orca was highest when their thyroid hormone levels were lowest. This means they’re malnourished. Katherine Ayres [8], a UW graduate student working on the study says: “It is interesting and sad. We have a link to what scientists have been saying for a long time.”

The orcas’ favorite food, Puget Sound chinook salmon, were listed as a threatened species nearly 10 years ago. In recent years the whales have been ranging as far south as Monterey looking for California salmon. But it’s been a brutal year for California’s fish too. A report out today by California Trout [9] forecasts that 65% of native salmon, steelhead, and trout species will be extinct within 100 years.

No salmon, no orca. Work hard, Tucker the black Lab. Maybe Malia and Sasha could adopt you from afar and shed light on the plight of these whales in the wildlife-deprived halls of Washington DC—where their future will be decided [10] one way or another.

Julia Whitty [11] is Mother Jones’ environmental correspondent, lecturer [12], and 2008 winner of the PEN USA Literary Award [13], the Kiriyama Prize [14] and the John Burroughs Medal [15].


Links:
[1] http://depts.washington.edu/conserv/resident_orcas.html
[2] http://www.whaleresearch.com/thecenter/2008_About.html
[3] http://www.whaleresearch.com/thecenter/2008_News_SevenMissing.html
[4] http://www.whaleresearch.com/thecenter/2008_K7_.html
[5] http://my.earthlink.net/article/nat?guid=20081024/490299c0_3ca6_15526200810251347853007
[6] http://www.whaleresearch.com/thecenter/2008_Facts0004.html
[7] http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2008408354_orca19m0.html
[8] http://orcinus.blogspot.com/2008/07/tucker-dog-whale-research.html
[9] http://www.caltrout.org/article.asp?id=359&bc=1
[10] http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/27812209/
[11] http://julia.whitty.googlepages.com/home
[12] http://julia.whitty.googlepages.com/juliawhittylectures
[13] http://penusa.org/go/news/comments/1290/
[14] http://www.kiriyamaprize.org/pressroom/2008/pr_040108.html
[15] http://www.research.amnh.org/burroughs/medal_award_list.html

•December 12, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Friday » December 11 » 2009

Sharp lessons in near-disaster

Times Colonist

Tuesday, November 24, 2009

If British Columbians want to know about potential marine disasters on their coast, they should pay close attention to news from Washington State’s environment department.
Last Wednesday night, as storm winds hammered the region, the bulk carrier Hebei Lion was anchored off Mayne Island. Its anchor failed to hold and the giant ship — more than two football fields in length — blew onto a rocky reef.
The next day, the Washington State environment department issued a news release providing public information on the incident, the threat and the state’s response. Staff and volunteer spill teams were put on standby alert.
Neither the B.C. nor Canadian government provided any information to the public that day, or in the days that followed.
The Gulf Islands Driftwood, apparently alerted by people monitoring marine radio, had a report Thursday. But because of the governments’ silence, virtually all British Columbians were kept in the dark for days.
The threat of a disaster was real. Dale Jensen, Washington’s manager of spill prevention and response, said there were “profound environmental and economic risks.”
The ship ran aground on rocks in Navy Channel, adjacent to Mayne, Pender, Saltspring, Saturna and Galiano islands. “Damage to fuel tanks on a cargo ship that size could have oiled the islands on both sides of the border,” Jensen said.
The freighter can carry 1.2 million gallons of fuel oil, about one-tenth the amount of oil spilled in the Exxon Valdez disaster.
A spill was averted in this case, at least in part because of good luck. The Hebei Lion ran onto the rocks at low water during a rising tide. The hull was apparently not punctured and tugs were able to free the ship the next day.
The incident raises several questions.
The most obvious is why Washington State officials — who were notified of the grounding by B.C.’s Environment Ministry — considered this important enough to tell the public about, while provincial and federal agencies here stayed silent.
That should add to concern about the governments’ support for the Enbridge pipeline from Alberta’s oilsands to Kitimat and the jump in tanker traffic as large ships transport the oil to Asia.
The pipeline proposal, after several years, is winning increased commercial backing.
Producers see diversification opportunities in China and Korea and there is increasing concern that the U.S. climate-change policy will create barriers for oilsands exports, which require significant carbon emissions as part of the production process.
The debate about tanker safety, the risks for British Columbia’s coast and the long-term benefits for the province continues.
But proponents have stressed two factors. Government oversight and regulation would protect the environment even with a large volume of tanker traffic. (The pipeline would deliver 22 million gallons of oil a day to the coast.)
And the shipping industry has its own effective safeguards, the backers of increased tanker traffic maintain.
The Hebei Lion incident raises doubts on both counts. The grounding reveals that risks remain, despite the most modern technology.
And the response — particularly in terms of public accountability — undermines government claims of vigilance and openness.
© Times Colonist (Victoria) 2009

http://www2.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/comment/story.html?id=2f97e6fc-05ee-437d-a273-45b1bbd1da63

State-funded tug prepared to help tanker off Washington coast

•December 4, 2009 • Leave a Comment

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – Dec. 3, 2009
09-283

OLYMPIA – The state-funded emergency response tug stationed at
Neah Bay was ready to respond to the aid of a 500-foot chemical tanker
that lost power Wednesday, Dec. 2, 2009, off of the Washington coast.

The tug named Hunter was dispatched Wednesday night to assist
the Ginga Falcon, a chemical product tanker operating under a Panamanian
flag. The tanker was sailing from Vancouver, B.C., to San Francisco.

The Ginga Falcon was carrying paraffin wax, caustic soda (a
highly corrosive industrial chemical) and ethylene glycol (a toxic
liquid used in antifreeze and deicing solutions).

The Washington Department of Ecology (Ecology) was notified of
the situation yesterday afternoon when the U.S. Coast Guard (Coast
Guard) requested the Hunter be placed on standby for the incident.

At the time of the Coast Guard request, the response tug had
already left its Neah Bay berth as a precautionary measure. Ecology then
directed the tug to proceed toward the disabled tanker.

The Ginga Falcon can carry up to 20,000 tons of cargo. However,
it was unclear how much cargo and fuel was onboard at the time of the
incident.

The tanker was about 45 miles off of Washington’s coast when a
pipe ruptured on a boiler that heats the ship’s engine fuel. After
several hours without power, the crew was able to repair the pipe and
restore the ship’s propulsion. The tanker then resumed its journey to
San Francisco at about 8:30 p.m. The response tug proceeded back to Neah
Bay.

An emergency response tug is stationed at Neah Bay year-round to
respond to shipping incidents that pose a pollution threat to the Strait
of Juan de Fuca and Washington’s outer coast. Crowley Maritime holds the
emergency response tug contract through June 2010.

“This incident involving an outbound tanker from a Canadian port
and the Nov 19, 2009, grounding of the 800-foot cargo ship Hebei Lion in
Canadian waters less than 10 miles from Washington’s San Juan islands
once again demonstrates how connected and potentially vulnerable our
shared waters are,” said Ecology Spills Program Manager Dale Jensen. “A
major oil or chemical spill has the potential to seriously damage
Washington’s economy, environment and quality of life. This is why we
maintain a 24/7, 365-day-a-year response capability.”

In March 2009, Gov. Chris Gregoire signed a bill passed by the
state Legislature requiring Washington’s maritime industry to fund and
operate a tug year-round at Neah Bay beginning July 1, 2010. Jensen said
the legislation also directs Ecology to encourage Canadian shipping also
to help pay for the system.

Since 1999, a state-funded emergency response tug has been
called out 43 times to help vessels in distress.

###

Media Contact: Curt Hart, 360-407-6990; cell, 360-480-7908
(curt.hart@ecy.wa.gov)

For information about the Neah Bay emergency response tug:
www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/response_tug/tugresponsemainpage.htm

Ecology Spill Prevention, Preparedness, and Response Program:
www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/spills.html

Ecology’s Web site: www.ecy.wa.gov

US cruise industry under fire again in new report

•December 3, 2009 • Leave a Comment
Sustainable Shipping

2nd December 2009 23:15 GMT

Reports looks at possible solutions to cutting pollution from the cruise industry

The US cruise industry has found itself in the spotlight once again with the release of a new report this month that has been prepared for environmental group Friends of the Earth (FoE).

The report looks at both sea and air pollution from North America’s 189 cruise ships, violations of environmental laws, and regulations and possible solutions to the problem.

When looking at treatment of wastewater, the report’s author Ross Klein states the results are “shameful”.

“Treatment of wastewater – sewage and gray water – has been found by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to not adequately meet even water quality standards set for onshore sewage treatment plants,” the report noted.

“The problem is made more serious by loopholes in the Clean Water Act,” it added.

Klein went on to say that the Act fails to classify sewage from cruise ships as a pollutant for permitting purposes, and fails to apply water quality standards to ships traversing US coastal waters beyond three nautical miles.

“While the cruise industry has introduced initiatives to better deal with cruise ship waste streams, these measures often fall short,” it noted.

The report, however, does recognise that some US states have taken dramatic steps to deal with pollution from cruise ships.

“Though responsibility has economic costs, these are modest for an industry that earns billions of dollars”

Alaska has set high standards for wastewater discharged into state waters, regularly monitoring air emissions when ships are in port, and employing onboard observers to ensure compliance with state regulations.

Maine prohibits discharge of gray water and treated sewage into state waters, Washington State prohibits discharge of sewage sludge within twelve miles of the shore through a MoU with the cruise industry, and California bans the discharge of all wastewater, sewage sludge, and oily bilge water into state waters.

The author continues that “if its public commitments to be responsible stewards of the marine environment are to be believed” the cruise industry appears ready to comply with regulations that protect and preserve the marine environment.

He does note, however, that cruise industry “behavior” has brought more than $55 million in fines since 1998, “which undermine such claims.”

The report highlights an “urgent need” for a minimum set of regulation across the US territorial waters.

“Though responsibility has economic costs, these are modest for an industry that earns billions of dollars in net income each year.

Carnival Corporation alone earned more than $9 billion net profit over the past four years and, as a foreign registered corporation sailing foreign registered ships, pays virtually no corporate taxes to the US other than that paid for its tour operations in the Pacific Northwest and Alaska,” Klein said.

Among its recommendations the report says that discharge of untreated sewage shall not be permitted within the US Exclusive Economic Zone and that systems used for treatment of gray water shall undergo monthly testing and evaluation by the US Coast Guard or US EPA.

Natalie Bruckner-Menchelli, 2nd December 2009 23:15 GMT

// //

//

Tug company fined for Seattle and Puget Sound oil spills

•November 19, 2009 • Leave a Comment

This non-union operation does all the bunkering in Puget Sound.

 

Department of Ecology News Release – November 18, 2009

09-269

BELLEVUE – The Department of Ecology (Ecology) has fined Olympic Tug & Barge Co. (Olympic) $47,000 for two oil spills, one last year in the West Waterway off Harbor Island in Seattle and one this year off Bainbridge Island.

“Olympic took these incidents very seriously,” said Dale Jensen, who manages Ecology’s spill prevention, preparedness and response program. “The company’s success at ensuring that boat crews strictly follow its policies for internal fuel transfers will lead to effective protection for Washington’s waters.”

“In our investigations into both cases, we found that the responsible crew members failed to comply with established company procedures for internal transfers, which resulted in the termination of both individuals,” said Sven Christensen, General Manager for Olympic Tug & Barge. “Our investigations also found that human factors were the root cause in both incidents. We have since made systemic changes to improve training of vessel crews and to ensure compliance with company policies and procedures.”

The second incident – which prompted a $23,000 fine – occurred on the night of Feb. 2, 2009, when the tug Catherine Quigg was under way southbound off Bainbridge Island. Crew members noticed fuel spilling off the deck into the water. An internal fuel transfer between tanks was immediately halted.

The spill – later calculated at 211 gallons by Ecology – left a sheen in the main shipping channel. Olympic hired a response contractor which responded with four boats to recover oil from the water. Ecology inspected Bainbridge Island beaches by foot and by boat at first light and observed no shore impacts from the spill.

Investigators determined that a tank overfilled during the transfer, possibly because the piping system and valves had not been inspected beforehand as required in the company’s policies and procedures. The chief engineer – who was new to the Catherine Quigg – had not completed an orientation for that particular vessel. The tug captain had assigned too few crew members to monitor the transfer. Close monitoring enables a crew to spot and stop potential overflows. The crew also failed to plug the scuppers – drain holes on the deck.

Olympic may request Ecology reconsideration of the penalties or file appeals to the Washington State Pollution Control Board within 30 days.

Ecology’s spill prevention and response programs are part of the department’s efforts to reduce toxic threats and to restore Puget Sound.

###

Media Contacts:
Larry Altose, Ecology media relations, 206-920-2600
David Byers, Ecology spill response section manager, 360-407-6974
Dione Lee, Director of Quality, Safety and Environmental Protection, 206-447-3057.

For more information: http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/spills/spills.html